【吳震】一包養價格朱子學理氣論域中的“生生”觀——以“理生氣”問題為焦點

requestId:684aed9a2cfc20.25113898.

Zhu Zi’s “life” view in the field of theoretical atmosphere

—— Focus on the problem of “physical energy”

Author: Wu Zhen (produced by the School of Philosophy of the Daughter of the Daughter of the Daughter of the Chinese Academy of Sciences)

Source: “Qinghua University. Philosophy and Social Science Edition” 2019 Issue 6

Time: Confucius’s Gengzi report was held in the 2570s. Wushen on the thirteenth day of the spring

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      From the perspective of Zhu Xi’s theory and atmosphere, its original universe theory contains rich “birth” theory. Moreover, Zhu Xi emphasized the basic ideas of a series of science, such as “the destiny of heaven”, “the destiny of heaven”, and “the outflow of heaven”. It can be seen that the Taiyang body learned by Zhu Xi has the dynamic meaning of the original meaning, and all phenomena such as yin and yang must originate from the Taiyang body. Therefore, “Taijin generates yang and yang, and principles generates energy” can become a set of theoretical denominations that are self-consistent with theory. Zhu Xi’s intrinsic theory adopts the concept of “birth” to wear the elusive, static, and elusive body, forming a set of philosophical systems of natural principles and physical concepts with the elusive as the focus and the concentration of principles and atmosphere.

 

Keywords: Zhu Zi’s rational and qi; qi of qi; qi of qi of qi of qi

 

According to Zhu Zi’s basic preset of qi theory, qi is a world without interest and ambition and will not be artificial, and qi is the power point of “aggregating organisms”. The activity of qi is “similar to humans cross horses”, and it must be stuck on the air, moving at will, and regulating oneself is not active. Therefore, the principles learned by Zhu Xi are “only existence but not active” (Mu Zongsan’s words). It means that the principles learned by Zhu Xi do not have any talent or power to create morality or tolerate all things. In the study of ethics, it must be a form of moral heterodoxism, which not only escapes from the Confucian tradition of Confucius and Mencius, but also deviates from the Chinese philosophy tradition-the moral self-discipline.

 

The striking thing is that if you look back at Zhu Zi’s Confucianism from Jiang Yuan (Japan), you can find that among the anti-theoretical “Ancient School” thoughts that appeared in the 17th century japan (Japan) Tokugawa period, there is a group of ancient school japan (Japan) Confucianists who believe that the Chinese Zhu Zi’s dualistic theory of theory is expressed. The emergence of the thinking and interest of rationality makes the spirit “game” suppressed by the rigid “game”. In their opinion, the “game” learned by Zhu Xi is just “death principle” (Ogiso’s rebirth) or “death character” (Ito Hitoshi) and lacks vitality. Therefore, as long as the metaphysical learning of the nature of Zhu Xi learned by Zhu Xi can restore the Confucianism and the emphasis on life from the beginning. [1]

 

It is obvious that the above two theoretical criticisms of Zhu Zixue are “closed to build cars,The occasional phenomenon of “outside the door and the sympathy” does not exist in this, but the conclusions are similar, that is, they almost disagree that the principles learned by Zhu Xi are a “death principle” that lacks vitality.

 

The theme of this article does not focus on exploring the problems of moral self-discipline or external discipline and the theory of “only exist but not active” The problem of efficiency does not lie in delving into whether Zhu Zi’s theory is “death theory” or “reactive”, but through the analysis of the meaning of Zhu Zi’s theory, especially the fate of “physical and biological” analysis, we will explore the problem of “life” in Zhu Zi’s philosophical studies, which can be found but not valued, and its theoretical contributions. We believe that Zhu Zi’s theory uses the concept of “life” to reconstruct a set of Guantaizi. , the static and yang universe theory has promoted the theoretical perfection and development of the theory of the universe since the Northern Song Dynasty, and is worthy of deep exploration.

 

1. Basic Preparation of Zhu Zi’s Gambling Proposition

 

Zhu Zi’s Gambling Proposition has a basic setting: that is, “reason first and then” and “reason is in harmony” “Zhong” can be established at the same time. The former is metaphysical, and the latter is speaking from the perspective of the physical perspective. The former belongs to the theoretical intrinsic theory, and the latter belongs to the rational structure. As for the relationship between rationality, if we talk from the perspective of intrinsic theory and structure, Zhu Zi used the concepts of “not separated” and “not confused”. Zhu Zi’s thinking was first seen in the ninth year of Qiandao (1173) <a A point expressed in the "Taiyang Interpretation" finalized in the fifteenth year of Chunxi (1188):

 

This is called “no extreme and too extreme”, so it is the original body of moving and yang, calm and yang, but it is not because it is separated from yinyang. That is, Yinyang refers to its essence, and it does not matter to Yinyang but is just a word. [2]

 

This is the first time that Zhu Xi clearly used the concept of “originality” to describe “Taiyang”, which has a symbolic meaning for the construction of Taiyang intrinsic theory; the illusion concept of non-separation and non-confusion that appears here refers to the relationship between Taiyang and Yinyang, which is “not separated” and “not confused” later. In the process of Zhu Xi’s construction of the theory of the gamut, this description is considered to be “the unrestrained” and “the unmatched” and is used to summarize the most basic characteristics of the gamut of the gamut.

 

The so-called “the unrestrained” refers to the existence of the gamut in the real world, where the appearance is not separated and the existence of any real thing. The structure has two basic elements: preparatory and atmosphere, and one cannot be missing; the so-called “reason is not complicated” means that if the principle is metaphysical, the atmosphere is physical, and the two are completely “two things”, but they are not equal to each other. Therefore, in the article “Taiyang Explanation”, Zhu Xi clearly used the original body to highlight Taiyang, which was different from the physical yinyang. He said: “Taiyang is the way of metaphysical; Yinyang is the physical yin.It is a tool. “On the other hand, Zhu Zi clearly pointed out that in the process of static and static yang, Taiyang has the characteristics of “divergent time” and “divergent position”. [3]

 

The relationship between Taiyang, static and static yang discussed here I will discuss in detail the problem, the entire universe theory and even the construction of Zhu Xi’s science. Zhu Xi’s theoretical goal is: First, to transform a set of cosmic innate arguments that “the sun is born from the sun” into the cosmic intrinsic arguments. The reason why Taiyang is “motivated and yang” lies in the essence of Taiyang; secondly, Taiyang, as the original body, exists in the process of Yinyang static – “not leaving”, and at the same time, as the “original body” Taiyang cannot be confused with Yinyang himself – “not messy”; thirdly, in the endless process of the universe of “Taiyang is born from Yang”, even though Taiyang has her luggage that he helped to move in the process of Yinyang static. He had also wanted her There are undetermined characteristics of “difference time” and “difference position”, and Taiyang is always “absent-minded”. From the perspective of Taiyang intrinsic, although it is invisible and invisible, the “reason” of the static and static yin has been “all contained in it”. [4]

 

However, the problem is why this metaphysical principle of Taiyang intrinsic yin and yang “moves” and produces the physical atmosphere of the yin and yang? This is the problem of “the dynasty of principle”, which is one; second, assume that Liuhe The “metaphysical principle” that has existed before it has been formed – a big hypothesis, can it “exist” without any existence? This is the eternal question of reason. Let’s first see how Zhu Zi answered the second question:

 

And if all the lands are trapped, the truth is only here. [5]

 

 

After the opening, it has not been thousands of years since its inception. I wonder what has happened before? “He said: “It should be clear before this.” “Is Liuhe going to be in danger? “He said: “I won’t 官网可以正可以正可可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正可以正� But it turned out that the

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *

More Articles & Posts